Comrades, bridge backers are enemies

communistheadersmall.jpg

Much has been said about the Windsor Star’s second page article on Saturday entitled, “Blogger linked to bridge firm,” and I have capitulated to its demands - and have redesigned my blog site to demonstrate my compliance with their objective.

I guess NDP MP, Brian Masse discussed more than intellectual property rights in China when he visited there in January (Windsor Star, Jan. 15, A4), namely, curtailing freedom of speech rights in Windsor-Essex. You see, China does not take to kindly to political dissenters, and given Mr. Masse’s comments of late regarding issues of freedom of speech, I can only conclude that neither does he.

Afterall, we are at war with the enemy, and in the time of war some restrictions on civil liberties are justified, comrades. I just wonder how long it is before our dear MP demands that Canada’s New Government invoke the War Measures Act in Windsor-Essex.

Now in all seriousness, the Star’s article was very loaded, but I’ve reduced it to three overall objectives:

  • Dissenters of the official stance towards the Ambassador Bridge will not be tolerated by the Windsor Star, the City of Windsor and NDP MP Brian Masse;
  • Bloggers are tarnishing the reputation of Windsor abroad; and
  • The Windsor Star wants people to read Mr. Arditti’s blog.

This Star article was something right out of George Orwell’s book “1984.” Not only have they been tracking Mr. Arditti’s actions over the years, they have become the self-proclaimed “thought police” in the City of Windsor.

The first message was loud and clear and reflects conclusions made in “The Outcomes of Coattail Marketing: The Case of Windsor, Ontario, and Super Bowl XL,” that the Windsor Star, “…was fully supportive of the official political line of the city.” The political line now being that the Ambassador Bridge is the “enemy”.

Then we have Brian Masse, who suddenly is concerned that Arditti’s blog can, “confuse people and damage the city’s reputation.”

Well according to Mr. Masse, in Windsor, “street after street after street” are “clogged, congested and affected”; and that children are “wearing oxygen and other respiratory measurements when they go to school because of the contaminants and the pollution hazards.” And Windsor’s economy is shot too as he informs parliament that, Businesses cannot function and schools, churches and homes are affected. We learn also that “chemicals and hazardous materials that are crossing the Ambassador Bridge.” We also learn that the City approved the Bridge company’s plaza expansion on a “site..that has aboriginal status.” (Mayor Eddie Francis stated in Senate Committee Hearings that the City of Windsor gave approval to the Ambassador Bridge to undertake work on its plaza).

Even the Montreal Gazette has criticized Mr. Masse for his comments in the House, by stating, “Speaking of which, a grown-up should have a few words with Brian Masse, the New Democratic MP from Windsor, Ont., who compared Hezbollah’s political wing to the Bloc Quebecois.” (The Gazette, August 25, 2006, A.18).

In other words Canada, Windsor is plagued with a chaotic and dangerous border, businesses are failing and children are wearing oxygen masks. Wow. I can just see now hordes of families coming to Windsor and calling it home.

What is more disturbing, is that Mr. Masse is basically speaking against freedom of speech - and this isn’t the first time (See Gord Henderson’s column, January 20th, 2007). One would think that coming from the NDP, he would be opposed to any restrictions of civil liberties, whether implied or real.

The final objective of the article it seems was to promote Arditti’s blog. The Star wrote, “Arditti, a lawyer who operates WindsorCityBlog…” In an email to Mr. Arditti (oh no, I communicated with a bridge backer) he confirmed that his blog hits on Saturday had more than quadrupled. Now, why would, despite the Star’s blatant attempt to discredit Arditti, they promote his blog? All one has to do is type in Google, “WindsorCityBlog” and up pops his blog. In its attempt to discredit they have given Mr. Arditti incredible credibility and exposure. So will now Mr. Masse claim the Windsor Star is “damaging the City’s reputation?”

But that said, the message was loud and clear, comrades. We must remain united. We cannot stray. We must wholeheartedly support our esteemed Emperor, and his agents in their battle against our enemy without question and without dissent. Only in solardarity will we overcome. All Hail Emperor Francis! All Hail The Windsor Star!

4 Responses to “Comrades, bridge backers are enemies”

  1. Michael Hickenbottom Says:

    Tovarisch!

    The Imperialist hordes are at the gates! Now is not the time for capitalist cowards and fascist rats! We must all contribute, from those according to their abilities to those according to their needs and come up with THE 5-year plan that will defeat the Bridge and bring the People’s Republic of Windsor to its glorious Marxist destiny.

    Nazdravaljah!

  2. Mark Boscariol Says:

    I think the border debate obfuscates the real issue of why do we worry about a third crossing when we have never finished the roads leading up to the first two? I have a different problem with the Ambassador Bridge company than many windsorites

    As a downtown proponent, I am mainly worried about the Bridge’s proposed plan to move tunnel customs to the bridge. The bridge has stated that those plans “were on the back burner” 2 years ago but only recently bid on the downtown parking garage that is used by tunnel customs on our side.

    Moving tunnel customs to the Bridge would eliminate any potential to improve our downtown to downtown link that is one of our areas best hopes.

    Detroit is having success revitalizing its downtown through a focused residential drive, new streetscape and Tax incentive financing for new businesses. (while Detroit city’s population shrank by 50,000, Detroit’s downtown population grew by over 1000).

    Windsor needs to increase its links to downtown and the Bridge has never formally said it would drop its proposal to move tunnel customs out of downtown, only that it was on the back burner, while at the same trying to buy assets used by the tunnel operations.

    I can’t support a private company that is working to end any hopes I have of tying our two downtowns together through initiatives such as combining our Riverfronts/Riverwalks etc… Even if they’re initiative is on the back burner, that is not acceptable, I want it assurances it is placed in Deep Freeze, permanently.

    Support our downtown by advocating for the same development incentives and streetscaping that are working in Downtown Detroit and that have worked in every downtown that has implemented them.

    Mark Boscariol

  3. chrisschnurr Says:

    Mark -
    Have you considered contact the Canadian Transit Company themselves and posing this very question?

    As you are aware, I attended the Community Outreach session with other interested unaffiliated individuals and posed this very question to Mr. McMahon.

    Now I’m not in a position to aptly explain what the Bridge company had intended, and, if you have questions, I would highly suggest you contact him and pose your questions. These are the very questions and concerns they want to hear about.

    That is of course if anyone dare talk to the Bridge Company.

  4. Paul Levesque Says:

    It’s amazing the boogeymen that frighten people.

    There is no conceivable way that customs for the bridge and tunnel can be consolidated on the US side.

    The “linking” roadway on the US side - the one that would under Cobo somehow and pop up in the “200 booths” airport style customs? - is so ludicrous, that I’m sure SEMCOG, Carmine Palumbo, the City of Detroit Planning Department and MDOT would blink back at you in staring disbelief if you said this was an option. It is not even remotely viable. Maybe, only maybe, if Kwame wanted to commit hari kari on a brainless idea.

    Why the bridge company threw that out there two years ago is not such a mystery - they have a long history of obfuscating the issues to delay resolution and sabatoge dialogue if it serves their purposes.

    That being said, Mr. Boscariol, you bring up an excellent point - fix the roads to the existing crossings, then worry about new ones.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.